Wednesday, July 23, 2014

New York: Pigs Beat Black man to death for selling cigarettes


by Tokunboh Jiboque


The recent video recording of the death of Eric Garner during a suspicious arrest made by several White NYPD uniformed and undercover law enforcement officers, has caused an uproar, as the footage circulates online. The 43-year old father of six, and grandfather of two, was arrested for allegedly selling untaxed cigarettes that were not found on his person or in his vehicle. While his death is tragic, a black man dying at the hands of the NYPD, or at the hands of the police over a crime that never occurred or wrong assumptions, is nothing new; this type of murder in America has become passé and a common thing in every City, County and State in America. It is considered a hazard of ‘Breathing While Black (BWB).

Caucasian law enforcement officers have a century-long history of killing a large percentage of black men they come in contact with. This is due, in part, to the mentality of post-slavery fear, and hatred, of the Black community that African-Americans have endured for centuries, and also due in part to inept unprofessionalism, low self-esteem, a tendency towards settling personal vendettas and an incredible lack of adequate training among law enforcement officers despite an unprecedented massive militarization of their weaponry by the Federal government.

In Garner’s case, witnesses verified Garner’s repeated statements to police that he had done nothing wrong, and despite Garner expressing his frustration with being repeatedly harassed, officers still aggressively handcuffed him and placed him under arrest with no proof that he had actually violated any law. An officer can be seen placing Garner in an illegal chokehold in footage of the incident. After telling officers multiple times that he could not breathe, his body goes limp. As several publications point out in their reporting of Garner’s death, there will most likely be rallies, memorials, and a lawsuit regarding the NYPD’s excessive use of force just as there have been in thousands of other cases around the country. One thing that will most likely not happen, as it has rarely happened in other instances, is having the officers responsible be punished for their actions. This week is the 50th anniversary of 15-year-old James Powell being shot and killed by a white NYPD officer. Before and since that time, there have been many more black men killed by officers.

Nicholas Heyward Jr. was shot in the stomach and killed by an NYPD officer in Brooklyn in 1994 when his toy gun was mistaken for a real gun during a game of cops and robbers. He was just 13-years-old. No charges were pressed against Officer Brian George who fired the fatal shot. Another case where officers were not convicted of any wrongdoing is the noted case of Amadou Diallo who had 41 shots fired at him by four officers who allegedly thought his wallet was a gun. A matter of days after the officers who killed Diallo were acquitted and mere blocks from where he was murdered, 23-year-old Malcolm Ferguson was shot and killed in his home by undercover officer Louis Rivera. Ironically, Ferguson had been arrested just a week before his death for protesting the acquittal of the officers who killed Amadou Diallo. Ousmane Zongo is another African American who was shot and killed by NYPD during a raid of the warehouse where he worked. Zongo had nothing to do with the CD/DVD operation that was being raided, but he was still shot four times by Officer Bryan Conroy because he ran. Conroy was disguised as a postal worker, so Zongo had no way of knowing that the person pointing a gun at him was actually a cop. Despite Conroy shooting Zongo after Zongo had come to a dead end and could not run any further, Conroy never received any jail time for shooting an unarmed man who was cornered and had committed no crime.

In the case of 19-year-old Tim Stansbury, Officer Richard Neri was only stripped of his gun and given a 30-day suspension for allegedly ‘unintentionally pulling his trigger’ (how does a trained police officer unintentionally pull a trigger?) and killing Stansbury while he stood on a rooftop in Brooklyn. Ramarley Graham is another teenager who was shot and killed by NYPD Officer Richard Haste. Haste claims he was responding to reports that Graham had a gun. After shooting and killing Haste in his grandmother’s bathroom, police only found a small bag of marijuana. A grand jury did not return an indictment against Haste for murdering Graham. In all these cases, the murdered men were all African-American and the officers were White. If there were a similar prolonged, sustained decades-long spate of killings of innocent White teenagers by Black police officers, America would lose its goddamn mind.

According to statistics released by the October 22nd Coalition to Stop Police Brutality, NYPD officers killed 21 people in 2012 with nearly 90 percent of those killed being black or Hispanic. In 2012, for example, Chicago police shot 57 people, out of whom 30 were black and 2 were white. The recent death of Eric Garner while being placed under arrest underscores the fact that men of color dying at the hands of the NYPD is not abating, and as the years pass, dozens of deaths are turning into thousands. The reality is that this is not restricted to New York alone. In every state in America there are similar cases, some of which have received national headline attention while others are quietly swept under the rug.

In March of 1997, L.A.P.D. Detective Frank Lyga, while driving an unmarked police vehicle, got into a road rage argument with another man on Ventura Boulevard. Lyga says that after the other man threatened to “cap his ass”, he drew his service weapon and shot him. The man died. He later said that “this guy had ‘I’m a gang member’ written all over him.” The only problem was the “gang member” was actually Kevin Gaines and he was an off-duty L.A.P.D. police officer. He was black while Lyga is white and more telling, recently, Electronic Urban Report broke a story on a November 18, 2013 memo written by an unnamed officer to L.A.P.D. Assistant Chief Earl Paysinger. In the memo, the unnamed officer reports that Detective Frank Lyga had threatened to go to the media about the shooting being ‘a sanctioned hit’ on Gaines by the LAPD, meaning certain White officers had approved the murder of Kevin Gaines. Lyga reportedly told 37 people, including LAPD members, California Highway Patrol officers, Glendale Police Department staff, L.A. Port Police, and L.A. Unified School Police that Chief Bernard Parks had angered him by wanting to send him to another unit in attempt to “hide him for awhile.” Lyga reportedly boasted and laughed about blackmailing Parks, according to the memo. When an attorney asked him if he had any regrets, Lyga says “I said, ‘Yeah, I regret that he was alone in his truck at the time. Hear that? Alone in the truck at the time … I could have killed a whole truckload of them … and would have been happily doing it. ”As a result of the story going public, Lyga is now the subject of an Internal Affairs investigation and has been ‘relieved of duty pending the outcome of the investigation.’ - the usual.

We have repeatedly seen the anguish, suffering and tears of thousands of mothers of African-Americans such as Kenneth Harding, Derrick Jones, Derrick Gaines, Rahiem Brown Jr., James Rivera and Oscar Grant, all gunned down by police. White BART police officer Johannes Mehserle, the killer cop who shot an unarmed handcuffed Oscar Grant in the back at point-blank range in front of hundreds of BART subway riders in Oakland, Ca on New Years morning 2009 was given what amounted to a slap on the wrist. Since the Grant verdict day, instead of a decline in police violence we have seen a marked increase. We’ve seen an outrageous 680,000 people stopped and frisked in New York with over 95% of those stops being Black and Brown men with less than 5% resulting in any weapons recovered.

Stop and Frisk led to the shooting death of unarmed Ramarley Graham. We’ve seen police shoot a motorist Hernandez L. Dowdy in Memphis, TN after someone falsely accused him of car jacking. We’ve seen police in Pasadena shoot 19-year old Kendrick falsely accused of stealing a computer. We’ve seen an officer in Chicago shoot an innocent bystander named Rekia Boyd after he mistakenly thought the man standing next to her had a gun. We’ve seen police in White Plains New York shoot unarmed army vet, a senior citizen named Kenneth Chamberlain Snr. who accidently set off his medical alert pendant. The officer at the center of the killing, as in most of these cases, has a sordid history of brutality and racism. We seen Oakland police shoot high school senior Alan Bluford in the back and then lie about the self-inflicted wound the officer suffered. He shot himself and blamed Bluford. OPD has still refused to officially identify the officer.

I could go on for days citing story after story along with the fact that in many cities all over the United States police brutality incidents and police killing civilians are on the rise. For example, in Los Angeles which was supposed to have drastically reformed their police department, we seen a huge increase in police shootings. The department tried to blame it on citizens attacking them more; that assertion has since been proven to be false. What’s crazy about L.A. is that police pushed to get the city council to support a law that will keep officers records sealed from the public. The Malcolm X Grassroots Movement released a ‘Report on Extrajudicial Killings’, which found that Blacks are being murdered by the police at a rate of one every forty hours. Rosa Clemente of the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement stated that, “Nowhere is a Black man or woman safe from racial profiling, invasive policing, constant surveillance and overriding suspicion. All Black people- regardless of education, behavior or dress- are subject to the whims of the police in this epidemic of state-initiated or condoned violence.

In America, on average, every 40 hours a Black man or woman is executed by the police in America, be it justified or not. It takes nine months for a baby to be born and at least over ten years before it approaches pre-adolescence before the teenage years. Is this not the definition of systemized genocide? You do the math. I’ll say it again- if there were a similar prolonged, sustained decades-long spate of killings of innocent White teenagers by Black police officers, America would lose its goddamn mind. Reflect upon this for a minute- the Black hip-hop artistes that America were most scared of, or who espoused lyrics that were reaching a large portion of the Black populace, were quickly emasculated. The Jewish-controlled Hollywood machine made them offers they could not refuse in order to depict them in a decidedly pro- law enforcement light. Dig deep down into your psyche and see if you even realized that these men present themselves in your minds more in the roles society eventually feels comfortable placing them in - as policemen, sworn to uphold the law- their laws.

1. Detective Odafin Tutuola in ‘Law and Order: Special Victims Unit’ (Ice T).

2. Internal Affairs Investigator Kyle Timkins in ‘Rampart’, as well as an angry police captain in ‘21 Jump Street’ (Ice Cube).

3. Police Detective Jake Rodriguez in ‘Gang-Related’ (2 Pac).

4. Police Detective Moses Jones in ‘American Gangster’ (RZA of the Wu-Tang Clan).

5. Officer Maldonado in ‘Freelancers’ (50 Cent- Curtis Jackson).

6. Police Detective Emilio in ‘Ace Ventura: Pet Detective’ (Tone Loc).

7. Lieutenant Jim Bravura in ‘Max Payne’ and Officer Brandon in ‘New Year’s Eve’ (Ludacris).

8. Police Officer on ‘Hawaii Five-0’ (Sean. P. Diddy Combs)

9. Detective Paul in ‘Training Day’ (Dr. Dre)

10. Detective Turner in ‘Venom’ and Undercover Cop in ‘Feel it in the air’ (Method Man)

11. Detective Collins in ‘Date Night’ (Common)

12. Lieutenant Miller in ’Carmen’ (Mos Def)

13. F.B.I. Special Agent Mosley Drummy in ‘X-Files: I want to believe’ (Xzibit)

The fact is a majority of Black actors and men of influence regardless of vocation in America at some point are required to play the role of cops- or dress up as women. If they refuse, it generally means the end of their careers. L.L. Cool J, Denzel Washington, Eddie Murphy, Reginald Vel Johnson, Michael Warren, Taurean Blacque, Steve Harris, Jennifer Beales, even Tracy Morgan, Sonja Sohn, Martin Lawrence, Laurence Fishburn, Michelle Hurd, Regina King, Tracie Thoms, Erik King, Jamie Foxx, Don Cheadle, Corey Reynolds, Malik Yoba, Sidney Poitier, Danny Glover, Gregory Hines, Holly Robinson-Peete, Phillip Michael-Thomas, Chris Tucker, Keenan Ivory Wayans, Damon Wayans, Morgan Freeman, Forest Whitaker, Will Smith and dozens of other Black actors eventually learned and accepted this, albeit unwillingly.

A credible national database on use of force by police is a longtime goal of criminologists and reformers. A 1996 Bureau of Justice report notes that for decades, criminal justice experts have been calling for increased collection of data on police use of force. “We don't have a mandate to do that”, William Carr, a FBI spokesperson told the Los Vegas Review Journal. “It would take a request from Congress to collect that data.” Carr's claim is false because the ‘1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act’ instructs the Attorney General to “acquire data about the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers and to publish an annual summary of the data acquired” yet 20 years later this hasn’t happened.
Many, if not all, police accountability activists believe the police are wounding and killing more people than they were five or ten or twenty years ago, and that a higher percentage of the incidents are unjustified. The trend, they say, is all the more alarming because it has accompanied an overall decline in violent crime.

Information on police violence exists. Every time a cop fires a gun or otherwise uses force, details about the incident go into a case file. What's missing is an effort to consolidate the information, much less analyze it. “All the federal government would have to do is say (to police departments), provide this data or you won't receive funding,” says criminologist David Klinger, a former police officer. But the administration, like previous ones, isn't inclined to do so, and while a bipartisan group in Congress seeks information about people killed by the U.S. military, there's no comparable effort to uncover information about people killed by the U.S. police.
Invasive policing is only one aspect of the U.S. states comprehensive containment strategies to exploit Black people and to smother resistance.

To contain the upsurge of the Black liberation movement of the 1960’s and 70’s and protect the system of white supremacy, the institutional forces of racism have worked through governments at every level to destabilize the Black community via community divestment, massive employment discrimination, outsourcing, gentrification and other forms of economic dislocation. In addition, schools, housing, healthcare, other social services and transportation in Black communities have been denied equitable provision and distribution of public goods and resources to demographics other than Caucasian.

The U.S. state maintains and reinforces these economic injustices with the militarized occupation of Black communities by the police and a web of racist legislation like the ‘war on drugs’, discriminatory polices like ‘three strikes’ and ‘mandatory minimum’ sentencing. The result is a social system that mandates the prison warehousing of millions of Black people and extra-judicial killings where law enforcement killers act with impunity and, more often than not, are rewarded and promoted for murder. The oppression and police occupation of Black communities parallels the brutalization, denial of human rights and killings being committed by the Israeli occupying forces in Palestine. Nothing short of the structural integrity and survival of the Black community is at stake when we consider the historic record. America’s track record speaks for itself. Something must be done to stop these killings and have the officers, who continuously murder innocents based on the color of their skin, held accountable.

Hamas Peace Proposal Silenced


The deafening silence around the Hamas proposal for a 10-year truce

Francesca Albanese on July 22, 2014 79


Palestinian             rescue workers search for survivors under the rubble of a             house was destroyed by an Israeli missile strike, in Gaza             City, Monday, July 21, 2014. (Photo: Khalil Hamra/ AP)
Palestinian rescue workers search for survivors under the rubble of a house was destroyed by an Israeli missile strike, in Gaza City, Monday, July 21, 2014. (Photo: Khalil Hamra/ AP)
During its first 14 days, the Israeli military aggression on the Gaza Strip has left atoll of over 500 dead, the vast majority of whom civilians, and many more injured. Thousands of houses were targeted and destroyed together with other essential civilian infrastructures. Over one hundred thousand civilians have been displaced. By the time you will read this article the numbers will have grown higher and, despicably, no real truce seems in sight. When I say real, I mean practicable, agreeable to both sides and sustainable for some time.
The Israeli government, followed suit by Western media and governments, was quick to put the blame on Hamas for that. Hamas – they claim – had an opportunity to accept a truce brokered by Egypt – and refused it. Others have already explained at length why this proposal crafted without any consultations with Hamas, was hard to accept by Hamas.
Much less noticed by the Western media was that Hamas and Islamic Jihad had meanwhile proposed a 10 year truce on the basis of 10 – very reasonable – conditions. While Israel was too busy preparing for the ground invasion, why didn’t anyone in the diplomatic community spend a word about this proposal? The question is all the more poignant as this proposal was in essence in line with what many international experts as well as the United Nations have asked for years now, and included some aspects that Israel had already considered as feasible requests in the past.
The main demands of this proposal revolve around lifting the Israeli siege in Gaza through the opening of its borders with Israel to commerce and people, the establishment of an international seaport and airport under U.N. supervision, the expansion of the permitted fishing zone in the Gaza sea to 10 kilometers, and the revitalization of Gaza industrial zone. None of these demands is new. The United Nations among others have repeatedly demanded the lifting of the siege, which is illegal under international law, as a necessary condition to end the dire humanitarian situation in the Strip. The facilitation of movement of goods and people between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip had already been stipulated in the Agreement on Movement and Access (AMA) signed between the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority in 2005. Even the construction of a port and the possibility of an airport in Gaza had already been stipulated in the AMA, though the actual implementation never followed. The requested increase of the permitted fishing zone is less than what envisaged in the 1994 Oslo Agreements and it was already part of the 2012 ceasefire understanding. Unhindered fishermen’s access to the sea, without fear of being shot or arrested and having boats and nets confiscated by Israeli patrols is essential to the 3000 Gaza fishermen struggling to survive today by fishing in a limited area which is overfished and heavily polluted. The revitalization of the Gaza industrial zone, which has progressively been dismantled since the 2005 disengagement and by continuous military operations, was already considered a crucial Palestinian interest at the time of the 2005 Disengagement.
The proposed truce also demands the withdrawal of Israeli tanks from the Gaza border and the Internationalization of the Rafah Crossing and its placement under international supervision. The presence of international forces on the borders and the withdrawal of the Israeli army requested by Hamas is unsurprising, considered the heavy toll of casualties by Israeli fire in the Access Restricted Areas near the Israeli border (i.e. an area of 1.5km along the border comprising 35% of Gaza land and 85% of its whole arable land). The international presence should guarantee that Egyptian and Israeli security concerns are equally met.
The proposal also requests Israel to release the Palestinian prisoners whom had been freed as part of the deal to liberate Gilat Shalit and were arrested after the killing of the three Israeli youths in June 2014 in the West Bank; that Israel refrains from interfering in the reconciliation agreement between Hamas and Fatah; and that the permits for worshippers to pray at the Al Aqsa Mosque be eased.
Not only are these conditions sensible in light of previous agreements but, especially those who pertain to the lift of the siege, are the minimum standards that Hamas and the people of Gaza could accept in the current circumstances. As Raji Sourani reports, the most common sentence from people in Gaza after the announcement of the Egyptian ‘brokered’ ceasefire was “Either this situation really improves or it is better to just die”. The dire circumstances under which Gazans have lived in the last 7 years have indeed evoked in many the image of the enclave as “the world’s largest open air prison”. A prison which is overcrowded and where in 6 years there will no longer be enough drinkable water or capacity to provide other essential services, as a recent UN report denounces. Facing this gloomy context, for many the continuous launch of rockets from Gaza is a response to the siege and the harsh conditions imposed by the occupation.
One could imagine that an agreement on the basis of the Hamas proposal could not only stop the current round of hostilities but also pave the way towards a lasting solution of the conflict. However Israel has shown no interest in considering this proposal and continues to prefer the military option. As a result one wonders whether Israel really wants a long lasting resolution of the conflict. This resolution would necessarily require compromises on the Israeli side, including relinquishing control over the West Bank and Gaza. Netanyahu recently made it perfectly clear that this option is off the table. An eventual agreement between Israel and Hamas would further strengthen the legitimacy of Hamas in the newly achieved Palestinian unity, which is a prerequisite for any lasting peace. Legitimizing the Palestinian unity is something the Israeli government is avoiding like the plague as it would push forward their quest for justice in the international arena.
Perhaps more surprisingly, the international community – with the exception of Turkey and Qatar – has spent no words on the Hamas truce proposal although many of the points of the proposal already enjoy international support. This refusal to deal with the proposal is particularly problematic in the current context. Without any pressure by the international community, Israel, the party who has the upper hand in this conflict, will feel legitimized to keep refusing negotiations for a real truce with Hamas. Truces and negotiations are made with enemies not friends. International organizations and Western leaders, echoing Israel and the United States, maintain that Hamas is a terrorist organization and thus any direct negotiations with it are embargoed.
Hamas resorts to violence, which is often indiscriminate and targets civilians – also due to the lack of precision weapons. But so does Israel – no matter how sophisticated its weaponry is. If the point is to help parties negotiate, both parties have to be treated equally, encouraged to consider measures other than military ones and accept compromises based on international law. Especially when sensible proposals are on the table as in this case. The firm refusal to engage with Hamas at this point epitomizes the failure of the international community to deal with the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Unless the international community reverts this pattern by taking a honest stand grounded in international law and diplomacy, the plight of Gaza and of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will continue.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Bay Area Kickoff for Nationwide Month of Resistance to Mass Incarceration, Police Terror, Repression



Dr. Cornel West and Poet Marvin X endorse October as Nationwide Month of Resistance to Mass Incarceration. Marvin X says, "The Nation of Islam and the Black Panther Party called for a general amnesty. I say we must demand a general amnesty of all prisoners, most of whom are non-violent, drug addicted, mentally ill, poor and suffered lack of adequate legal representation."
Description: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif

Major Bay Area Kickoff Meeting
October 2014 Nationwide Month of Resistance to Mass Incarceration, Police Terror, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation
Saturday, July 26
2-5 p.m.
First Unitarian Church
685 14th Street (at Castro, right next to 980 Freeway)
Downtown Oakland
(wheelchair accessible)
Friends,
Just in the past few weeks we have witnessed:
​**1000's of children being driven across the border by US devastation of their homelands and then finding
 themselves caught between Homeland Security rounds-ups and flag-waving racists
​**The District Attorney in Santa Rosa California refusing any charges against the cop who murdered 13-year old
            Andy Lopez
​**2 videos that went viral showing cops brutally and unjustly beating Black women
All these and more outrages only serve to underscore more than ever that we need powerful outpourings of resistance in October– as envisioned in the Call for a Month of Resistance to Mass Incarceration, Police Terror, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation (www.stopmassinceration.net) that was adopted at the meeting convened in New York in April 2014.
Should YOU be at this meeting?
Yes! If you live directly under these threats, this violence, this repression and want to STOP IT!
Yes!  Even If you don’t yourself live directly under it, but you know that it’s wrong it and you want to STOP IT! 
In the early 1960’s, a relative handful of courageous people from different backgrounds traveled from the North to stand with the people against viscous Jim Crow racism in Mississippi. They changed themselves and they changed history.
We must do the same. Let’s all come together, individuals and organizations and make real plans for this coming October, so our determination to end all this reverberates across the country and around the world!
October 2014 needs to be a full month of many diverse forms of resistance
Already, prominent and respected voices are signing the Stop Mass Incarceration Network’s Call for the Month of Resistance. Join  Ayelet Waldman, novelist, lawyer ; Alice Walker, author; Peter Coyote, actor, author, director; Cornel West, author, educator, voice of conscience; Carl Dix, Revolutionary Communist Party; Noam Chomsky, Professor (ret.), MIT*; Cephus "Uncle Bobby" Johnson; Michelle Alexander, Marvin X and 100’s of others who have pledged to be part of the Month of Resistance
 Take the Pledge! Endorse the Call for October. Spread the Call far and wide!       
Be at! Bring others! to the Kick-off Meeting
Stop Mass Incarceration Network, San Francisco Bay Area
Phone: 510-984-3648stopmassincarcerationbayarea@gmail.com

Marvin X andThe Black Arts Movement Poets Choir & Arkestra Celebrating Amiri Baraka

Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks




Black Skin, White Masks Quotes


Black Skin, White Masks Quotes 
“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“...There are too many idiots in this world. And having said it, I have the burden of proving it.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks
t
“O my body, make of me always a man who questions!”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“Today I believe in the possibility of love; that is why I endeavor to trace its imperfections, its perversions.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks
“What matters is not to know the world but to change it.” ― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“The Negro enslaved by his inferiority, the white man enslaved by his superiority alike behave in accordance with a neurotic orientation.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks
“When people like me, they like me "in spite of my color." When they dislike me; they point out that it isn't because of my color. Either way, I am locked in to the infernal circle.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“I, the man of color, want only this: That the tool never possess the man. That the enslavement of man by man cease forever. That is, of one by another. That it be possible for me to discover and to love man, wherever he may be.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“Negrophobes exist. It is not hatred of the Negro, however, that motivates them; they lack the courage for that, or they have lost it. Hate is not inborn; it has to be constantly cultivated, to be brought into being, in conflict with more or less recognized guilt complexes. Hate demands existence and he who hates has to show his hate in appropriate actions and behavior; in a sense, he has to become hate. That is why Americans have substituted discrimination for lynching. Each to his own side of the street.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“A man who has a language consequently possesses the world expressed and implied by that language.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“The colonized is elevated above his jungle status in proportion to his adoption of the mother country's cultural standards.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“Oh my body, make of me a man who always questions!”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“One avoids Creolisms. Some families completely forbid Creole and mothers ridicule their children for speaking it.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks
t
“When someone strives & strains to prove to me that black men are as intelligent as white men, I say that intelligence has never saved anyone; and that is true, for, if philosophy and intelligence are invoked to proclaim the equality of men, they have also been employed to justify the extermination of men.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“To speak pidgin to a Negro makes him angry, because he himself is a pidgin-nigger-talker. But, I will be told, there is no wish, no intention to anger him. I grant this; but it is just this absence of wish, this lack of interest, this indifference, this automatic manner of classifying him, imprisoning him, primitivizing him, decivilizing him, that makes him angry.

If a man who speaks pidgin to a man of color or an Arab does not see anything wrong or evil in such behavior, it is because he has never stopped to think.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“Introducing someone as a "Negro poet with a University degree" or again, quite simply, the expression, "a great black poet." These ready-made phrases, which seem in a common-sense way to fill a need-or have a hidden subtlety, a permanent rub.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“We believe that an individual must endeavor to assume the universalism inherent in the human condition.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“[Educated blacks] Society refuses to consider them genuine Negroes. The Negro is a savage, whereas the student is civilized. "You're us," and if anyone thinks you are a Negro he is mistaken, because you merely look like one.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“ô mon corps, fait toujours de moi un homme qui s'interroge.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“At first glance it seems strange that the attitude of the anti-Semite can be equated with that of the negrophobe. It was my philosophy teacher from the Antilles who reminded me one day: “When you hear someone insulting the Jews pay attention; he is talking about you.” And I believed at the time he was universally right, meaning that I was responsible in my body and my soul for the fate reserved for my brother. Since then, I have understood that what he meant quite simply was the anti-Semite is inevitably a negrophobe.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“Get used to me, I am not getting used to anyone.” I shouted my laughter to the
stars.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks
“I feel my soul as vast as the world, truly a soul as deep as the deepest of rivers; my chest has the power to expand to infinity. I was made to give and they prescribe for me the humility of the cripple.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“For the beloved should not allow me to turn my infantile fantasies into reality: On the contrary, he should help me to go beyond them.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“As I begin to recognise that the Negro is the symbol of sin, I catch myself hating the Negro. But then I recognise that I am a Negro. There are two ways out of this conflict. Either I ask others to pay no attention to my skin, or else I want them to be aware of it. I try then to find value for what is bad--since I have unthinkingly conceded that the black man is the colour of evil. In order to terminate this neurotic situation, in which I am compelled to choose an unhealthy, conflictual solution, fed on fantasies, hostile, inhuman in short, I have only one solution: to rise above this absurd drama that others have staged around me, to reject the two terms that are equally unacceptable, and through one human being, to reach out for the universal.
When the Negro dives--in other words, goes under--something remarkable occurs.”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks

“I want the world to recognize with me the open door of every consciousness”
― Frantz FanonBlack Skin, White Masks