Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Gov. Schwarzenegger and the Maid


Don't Fuck the Maid! Men just don't get it. OJ, Kobe, Frenchman, Arnold! Will they get it before the sky falls. Look up, bro, the sky is falling!


LOS ANGELES — Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has acknowledged that he fathered a child with a member of his household staff, a revelation that apparently prompted wife Maria Shriver to leave the couple's home before they announced their separation last week.

Schwarzenegger and Shriver jointly announced May 9 that they were splitting up after 25 years of marriage. Yet, Shriver moved out of the family's Brentwood mansion earlier in the year after Schwarzenegger acknowledged the child is his, The Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.

"After leaving the governor's office I told my wife about this event, which occurred over a decade ago," Schwarzenegger told the Times in a statement that also was sent to The Associated Press early Tuesday. "I understand and deserve the feelings of anger and disappointment among my friends and family. There are no excuses and I take full responsibility for the hurt I have caused. I have apologized to Maria, my children and my family. I am truly sorry.



"I ask that the media respect my wife and children through this extremely difficult time," the statement concluded. "While I deserve your attention and criticism, my family does not."
Schwarzenegger's representatives did not comment further. A spokesman for the former first lady told the Times she had no comment.

The Times did not publish the former staffer's name nor that of her child but said the woman worked for the family for 20 years and retired in January.

In an interview Monday before Schwarzenegger issued his statement, the former staffer said another man – her husband at the time – was the child's father. When the Times later informed the woman of the governor's statement, she declined to comment further.

The child was born before Schwarzenegger began his seven-year stint in public office.

Shriver stood by her husband during his 2003 gubernatorial campaign after the Los Angeles Times reported accusations that he had a history of groping women. Schwarzenegger later said he "behaved badly sometimes."

In his first public comments since the couple announced their breakup, Schwarzenegger said last week that he and Shriver "both love each other very much."

Post Publisher Suspected Police Role in Murder of Chauncey Bailey

Oakland Post Publisher
Paul Cobb and Marvin X.
They were childhood friends
in West Oakland.
photo Walter Riley, Esq.








Slain Oakland Post Editor
Chauncey Bailey











Chauncey Bailey Murder Trial Nears End,


Oakland Police Drama Begins


As the Chauncey Bailey Murder trial wraps up, the long suspected Oakland police role in the murder investigation is being uncovered. Oakland Post Newspaper Publisher Paul Cobb and the Black Chauncey Bailey Project organizer Marvin X have long called for an investigation of the OPD's role in the assassination of Oakland Post Editor Chauncey Bailey.

The "white" Chauncey Bailey Project has resisted investigating the alleged police role in the assassination of Chauncey Bailey, focusing singularly on the indictment of the Black Muslim Bakery Brothers as the sole culprits, even though at the outset of the editor's assassination in broad daylight, Post Publisher Paul Cobb told the OPD that Chauncey was not only investigating the activities of YBMB, but more importantly, the alleged activities of corruption by African American members of the OPD.


He informed the DA Tom Orloff of his feelings. Not only did Orloff reject Cobb's assertion, but he resigned shortly after the killing. Police Chief Tucker resigned or retired as well.

Before he resigned, Chief Tucker suggested if Cobb wanted the OPD to pursue police involvement in the assassination of Chauncey, Cobb should get himself a bullet proof vest.


When Paul Cobb suggested the "White" Chauncey Bailey Project should also pursue police involvement, embedded OPD crime writer Harry Harris suggested Cobb was out of his mind. Cobb suggests Harris has been hanging around in the OPD locker room too long.


It is clear that Harry Harris has been embedded with the OPD far beyond any objective usefulness. The same may be true for Oakland Tribune Editor Martin Reynalds who related to Black Chauncey Bailey Project organizer Marvin X that the OPD had fine officers, especially Lt. Longmire, chief investigator of the Bailey killing as well as mentor of the murder suspects who was temporarily relieved of his duties due to conflict of interest. He was in charge of the crime scene and led the raid of the bakery, securing the murder weapon and a confession in less than 24 hours after the murder of Chauncey.


When Marvin X published the conversation he had with Oakland Tribune Editor Reynolds during a lunch meeting, Reynolds threatened to throw a Molotov Cocktail at Marvin X, one of the most prolific writers in America and the world. Marvin wrote eight books last year and is considered the USA's Rumi (Bob Holman), Plato teaching on the streets of Oakland (Ishmael Reed), the father of Muslim American literature (Dr. Mohja Kahf), one of the founders and innovators of the revolutionary school of African writing (Amiri Baraka).

As the murder trial concludes, it appears the OPD drama is just beginning. KTVU television reported last night that a long suspected cover up in the Bailey murder investigation has been uncovered.


Because of his association with those indicted for the murder of Chauncey, there are persons who think Marvin X's assertions are tainted. Marvin X rejects this. After all, Chauncey was his friend as well. One of his last stories was a review of Marvin's book How to Recover from the Addiction to White Supremacy.

--Marvin X

the Black Chauncey Bailey Project

http://www.theblackchaunceybaileyproject.blogspot.com

5/19/11




OPD Cover-Up Emerges


In Bailey Murder Investigation

Posted: 9:10 pm PDT May 18, 2011
Updated: 9:43 am PDT May 19, 2011

OAKLAND, Calif. -- As the eight-week trial of the alleged mastermind of the Chauncey Bailey murder heads to the jury this week, KTVU Channel 2 News has obtained hundreds of pages of legal documents never seen publicly that explain for the first time the inside story of the controversial homicide investigation.

It's a story that KTVU has largely been prevented from telling because of a gag order imposed by the command staff of the Oakland Police Department.

The documents paint a troubling picture of former top commanders at Oakland police misleading the public about several key aspects of the Bailey case.

On December 15, 2008, then-Oakland Police Chief Wayne Tucker called a highly unusual press conference to respond to a story revealing what may have been the single biggest turn in the assassination of Bay Area journalist Chauncey Bailey.

That was the discovery that Tucker had delayed for two days a massive police raid scheduled for August 1st, 2007 on the violent "Your Black Muslim Bakery" so a member of the chief's command staff could extend a camping trip.

But the next day, August 2nd, a self-described "soldier" from the bakery gunned down Bailey in cold blood on a downtown Oakland street. The delayed raid then took place on August 3rd, the day after the murder.

The documents contain charges that Tucker and his command staff held a private meeting just before the press conference, where they agreed to cover-up that decision when they met the news media.

In the sworn statement KTVU has obtained, an Oakland police captain testified he was in that meeting and spoke to the chief about what he regarded as a lie:

Captain Ersie Joyner: "Chief Tucker was adamant that we had only one date set and there was never two dates."

Attorney: "And to your knowledge, did Chief Tucker know that there were two dates, August 1st and then August 3rd?"

Joyner: "Yes."

Attorney: "Was there anyone else in that meeting with Chief Tucker and Chief Jordan and others who believed that the department had knowledge of the two dates, August 1st and August 3rd?"

Joyner: "Yes."

Attorney: "After that press conference, did you talk to Chief Tucker about what you perceived to be a dishonest statement?"

Joyner. "Yes."

San Francisco attorney John Scott, who is bringing a lawsuit against the city of Oakland on behalf of the lead investigator of the Bailey murder, says Tucker’s action goes to the heart of a story never heard before -- until now.

"The department, I believe, had its own sense of guilt or believed it had its own sense of guilt or responsibility for the murder because the department was supposed to execute a warrant on the Black Muslim Bakery on August 1st, the day before the murder." Scott said. "Now, no one is suggesting or implying the department intended to kill Chauncey Bailey."

Scott is representing Oakland police Sgt. Derwin Longmire, who has been under a gag order by the chief's office since the fall of 2007.

Longmire has never spoken to the news media about the Chauncey Bailey case. He also declined to speak to KTVU for this story.

But KTVU Channel 2 News has obtained sworn statements by Longmire and other Oakland police officials, some testifying that Sgt. Longmire has been unjustly painted as the scapegoat for the Bailey homicide investigation.

Tucker's assistant chief, Howard Jordan, launched internal investigations against Longmire because he believed the homicide investigator had become far too close to the Black Muslim Bakery and didn't tell his boss or colleagues what he was doing.

Recorded phone conversations between Longmire and Yusef Bey IV shortly after Bailey's murder indicate they had a close relationship:

"Nobody has the right to say we can't be friends because you know what I mean," Bey can be heard saying in one recorded call.

To which Longmire replied: "You know what, I totally agree. I totally agree. I feel that way wholeheartedly."

The documents KTVU obtained, however, have sworn testimony from Longmire's immediate supervisor saying he had ordered Longmire to take those actions and that the district attorney also knew -- and approved -- of them.

Longmire's lawsuit charges the Oakland police brass with discriminating against him and it uses sworn statements such as this one by Assistant Chief Howard Jordan to attempt to prove he made biased assumptions:

Attorney: "Did you believe that Sgt. Longmire had compromised the investigation because of that relationship with either the Black Muslims or the bakery?"

Jordan: "Yes."

Attorney: "At the time of the Chauncey Bailey murder, did you believe that Sergeant Longmire was associated with the Black Muslim Bakery?"

Jordan: "Yes."

However, the documents also include evidence that Longmire was not protecting the Black Muslims, showing that as early as five years before Bailey was shot Sgt. Longmire warned the police command staff that the bakery was a criminal enterprise and needed to be cleaned up.

No serious, sustained action was taken on those repeated warnings until it was too late.

The department moved to fire Longmire in May 2009.

After a series of internal investigations, Longmire was ultimately exonerated.

But even then, the Oakland command staff offered Longmire his job back only if he promised not to sue. He refused, and filed his lawsuit in April 2010.

Although Longmire is still prohibited from discussing the Bailey case, he did talk to KTVU when he filed his lawsuit against the department.

"There was so much media attention that when questions came up they couldn't answer about mistakes early on, for them there was no other way but to let it fall on someone and that someone was me," said Longmire.

Assistant Chief Howard Jordan declined to comment on this story through a letter from an attorney representing the city of Oakland.

A phone call to former chief Wayne Tucker, now a civilian, asking for his perspective on the allegations in these new documents brought this brief response:

"I have nothing to say to your s***** station,” Tucker declared. “Why don't you publish that? You should publish that."

The lawsuit is scheduled to go to trial in February 2012.




Copyright 2011 by KTVU.com. All rights reserved.

Monday, May 16, 2011

WGBH American Experience . Freedom Riders . Watch | PBS

WGBH American Experience . Freedom Riders . Watch PBS

The Frenchman and the Maid


Of the Frenchman and the maid

If it is true that the Frenchman who is charged with raping the maid in his $3,000.00 per night hotel suite, it is past time to discuss the mythology of pussy.

There is no time to cherry pick and nik pick words about a disgusting act of pathological sexual behavior. If the allegations are proven true, we suspect the gentleman who was in charge of the IMF and in line to be the next president of France, surely suffered a break with reality and retreated to a form of infantile behavior or shall we call it animalistic, certainly we would not suspect such behavior from a man in charge of bailing out Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Ireland--and maybe the great USA soon.

Yet, we have written about broken systems/broken minds. This gentleman fits the description if the allegations are proven true. Rape is an act of violence, pure and simple. And men with power often become totally delusional, thinking they own the world and all the women therein. Male rape is pandemic as well!

Why would a man of this stature not call a dating service, if he had sexual needs, surely he had the means, thus we think there is a question of his sanity, unless we must put him among those ignut men who still don't get it, that they don't have a pussy, no, not even the lowly maid's pussy belongs to them, tip notwithstandin.

During my exile in Mexico City, we had a live in maid, but my adviser told me not to have sex with the maid, don't even think about it. Number one, she will not want to clean shit after becoming emotionally involved.

Those persons in theatre and entertainment are surely aware of the danger of having sex with actors, especially before a production: it can ruin the entire production if either of the persons develop emotional problems, especially with the director and/or producer, but between actors as well.

And yet men (and women) often don't get it, even after being warned. Poor Kobe Bryant surely paid a high price for fucking his maid, including a six million dollar ring to sooth relations with his wife.

After persons read my most controversial piece of writing Mythology of Pussy (renamed Mythology of Love), men and women appear to get it. The men learn they don't own the woman and most especially her pussy. And nor does she own their dick. I am intentionally speaking as raw as I can because this subject is a pandemic, worldwide, men are performing acts of violence upon women and we wonder when will it end?

We see the necessity of a complete revamping of the male/female mythological order. The very idea of manhood and womanhood must be radically changed, especially from the religious foundation and other cultural and psychosocial rites and values, whether in simple male/female relations or ultimately in marriage.

The mythology and rituals perpetuate violence with the concept of ownership, yes, chattel property. Ironically, the church discovered long ago that the priesthood must be celibate in order to preserve property rights, yet it continued to enforce marriage rites that were de facto chattel slavery or personal property slavery. We will not discuss the result of sexual depravity as a result of celibacy.

And so once married, the mates accept that they own each other, that they are willing to kill over said ownership that include exclusive sexual rights/rites. The result is worldwide oppression of women and sometimes men. Even children and youth in their partner relations have been socialized to believe they own each other. Of course this is done in the name of Love, though we wonder what does ownership have to do with love, especially love that results in the often oppressive and violent treatment that puts mates in the hospital and/or grave.
--Marvin X

Global capitalism and 21st century fascism - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

Global capitalism and 21st century fascism - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

Marvin X as Psychic


Marvin X as Psychic

Marvin X has long felt the psychic powers in himself. Most often he would linger in self denial. Two years ago he gave up using his cell phone or any phone and urged his friends and family to ESP him when they wanted to talk.

Recenly he was planning an east coast book tour and wanted to talk with a friend in Washington DC, but didn't have his number. One Sunday Marvin was riding his bike to the Berkeley Flea Market. He thought about going to the Flea Market by biking down Dwight Way to Martin Luther King, Jr., but his mind told him to go Dwight Way to Sacramento to Ashby. As he turned the corner on Ashby heading to the Flea Market a car passed with his DC friend on the passenger side. The car stopped and he talked with his friend who had just arrived in town for his mother's funeral. Marvin told his friend he was trying to get in touch with him. The friend said he had just asked about him at the Flea Market. The friend told him there was no problem when he gets on the east coast, especially since he had an enjoyable time the last time the poet stayed with him. The friend was especially happy to see Marvin bike riding since it was his suggestion that Marvin get a bike. He had let Marvin used one of his bike while in DC.

More recently, something told Marvin to post the poem If We Must Die on his blog. He had no idea why he needed to post this classic anti-racist poem from the Harlem Renaissance by Claude McKay that was used by Winston Churchill during WWII, and later during the 60s Black Arts/Liberation Movement.

He posted the poem as his mind told him. A few hours later he was talking with his grandson who was on the phone talking with his grandmother, Marvin's former wife. The grandson left his house still talking with his grandmother, then the three year old returned to tell his grandfather his grandmother said tell your grandpa Osama bin Laden was just killed. Marvin was absolutely certain his posting of the poem had to do with the death of Osama bin Laden.

Just before the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, Marvin wrote a love poem with reference to the ocean and beach. Only after events in Japan did the poem make sense to him. It was clear the poem transcended romance and was a poetic precurser to events in Japan, It was written two days before.

In the poem, Marvin X suggests the beloved come to him as a wind, that his arms open wide as the earth opened when she quaked. He pleads with his beloved to do as she will but don't destroy him. We see the earth opened but was not gentle to the people, consuming all things in her path, just as the beloved rejected the poet's love call.

The poem ends with the poet suggesting the lovers walk upon the shore as the tide comes upon them. The people of Japan, and even those on the beach in California, were swept into the waves of the tsunami.

The Funny Thing is That I Already Knew

...when I see you coming toward me
a wind surrounds you
swirling swirling
a dance of the dervish accompany your stride
the wind blows you to me
my arms open wide to enfold the greatness of your spirit
I am here at your pleasure
do with me as you wish
no abuse please.
Yet I have no fear
I know you already know this.

Ah, the air is so fresh
we must go to the ocean soon
I want to walk on the shore
barefoot in the sand as the tide comes upon us
holding hands in the wind
as the dervish dance and swirl.
--Marvin X
4/9/11

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Sexual Abuse in the House of God

Clergy Sexual Abuse of Women Is a Violent Abuse of Power"Cléo Fatoorehchi interviews DR. VALLI BATCHELOR of the World Student Christian Federation Book Project

Valli Batchelor

Credit:Courtesy of Valli Batchelor


NEW YORK, May 15, 2011 (IPS) - Ninety to 95 percent of victims of clergy sexual exploitation are women, according to recent estimates by the Columbia Theological Seminary's Rev. Pamela Cooper White, and yet very few studies have been conducted on this issue.

Now, the World Student Christian Federation (WSCF), founded in 1985 and which represents more than a hundred social justice-oriented student movements from around the world, is breaking the silence with the publication of a book entitled "When Pastors and Priests Prey - Identifying, Preventing and Overcoming Clergy Sexual Abuse of Women".

The book will be launched at the International Ecumenical Peace Convocation (IEPC), held in Kingston, Jamaica May 17 to 25. The IEPC is a gathering of church leaders who will assess the outcome of the Decade to Overcome Violence, an initiative created in 2001.

The book's coordinator, Dr. Valli Batchelor, came to collaborate with the WSCF after the 2008 Commission on the Status of Women, where she was participating as an Islamic finance expert for the World Council of Churches, which sponsored the book.

She also runs the Journey Towards Hope Dance Project, which helps to educate and engage the public and prevent violence within communities.

Q: Why do you call clergy sexual abuse against women a "silent killer" within families and communities around the globe?

A: Clergy sexual abuse of women is a violent abuse of power rather than "an affair". Most people may recognise that it is an unacceptable abuse of power for a therapist or doctor to have sex with a patient. Yet many fail to recognise that when a clergy – who commits to spiritually nurture and guide a member of the church - takes advantage of his power and authority to have a sexual relationship with her, he is committing sexual abuse and not having an affair.

Clinical research from the Faith Trust Institute indicates that women victims are likely to remain silent, suffering severe consequences from depression to suicide.

Q: What can a woman do to protect herself?

A: Women can protect themselves from sexual abuse by understanding that people with power and authority in our society can abuse that power for their own ends. Stopping abuse before it begins is the best method for self-protection. If abuse has occurred, reporting the abuse is empowering because it breaks the silence surrounding the offender who is violating the trust placed in him.

Realisation of the betrayal of trust by clergy – who is believed to be the spiritual representation of God - is devastating and survivors need support to cope. Clergy offenders often use their spiritual authority to violate women, pleading or threatening the victims that they must forgive the offender's "sins" or risk being rejected by God for unforgiveness. This is spiritual blackmail and can trap victims into silence and suffering for years or decades.

Survivors recover best when they find someone who believes them and helps the survivor to bring the offender to justice and thus reduce the risk of the offender abusing other victims.

Q: How can people fight against such abuse?

A: First, the issue needs to be faced honestly: that sexual abuse is a violent abuse of power, not a matter of "an affair" between a clergyman and a female parishioner. Second, church congregations and church organisations need to recognise that clergy are capable of sexual abuse so that the churches can devise safe practices for clergy.

The WSCF and the WCC have jointly played a role of historic significance by pooling together the knowledge, experiences and voices of survivors, advocates, theologians and others to create this book, which will hopefully begin a cultural transformation within the worldwide church.

Q: Where does the law stand on this issue?

A: Criminal sexual offences committed by clergy can be prosecuted by the courts. Survivors who take on a criminal prosecution must give a police statement and be prepared to be cross-examined at a trial - and face brutal questioning from defence lawyers. The prosecutor must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt to secure a conviction.

Police are often unwilling to charge an offender unless they are confident of securing a conviction. Survivors of sexual offences by clergy are often embarrassed, trapped in confusion, guilt, shame and self-blame that most victims never make an official complaint to police. Worldwide conviction rates for all sexual assault cases are still very low.

Q: Should the church create some kind of tribunal?

A: Church organisations over hundreds of years have internal processes which are not transparent. Offending clergy have been protected by their church organisations for decades which intimidate victims into silence and cover up disclosures of abuse.

Prosecutions by civil authorities are more likely to be transparent and offer a better option than church tribunals.

(END)