Wednesday, January 23, 2013

The Battle of Algeria


Some Algeria Attackers Are Placed at Benghazi

  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
ALGIERS — Several Egyptian members of the squad of militants that lay bloody siege to an Algerian gas complex last week also took part in the deadly attack on the United States Mission in Libya in September, a senior Algerian official said Tuesday.
Multimedia
The Egyptians involved in both attacks were killed by Algerian forces during the four-day ordeal that ended in the deaths of at least 38 hostages and 29 kidnappers, the official said. But three of the militants were captured alive, and one of them described the Egyptians’ role in both assaults under interrogation by the Algerian security services, the official said.
If confirmed, the link between two of the most brazen assaults in recent memory would reinforce the transborder character of the jihadist groups now striking across the Sahara. American officials have long warned that the region’s volatile mix of porous borders, turbulent states, weapons and ranks of fighters with similar ideologies creates a dangerous landscape in which extremists are trying to collaborate across vast distances.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is scheduled to testify before Congress on Wednesday about the Libyan attack that killed the American ambassador and three staff members, raised the specter of regional cooperation among extremists soon after the mission in Benghazi was overrun.
In particular, she said the Islamist militant takeover of northern Mali had created a “safe haven” for terrorists to “extend their reach” and work with other extremists in North Africa, “as we tragically saw in Benghazi,” though she offered no clear evidence of such ties.
Now the Algerians say the plot to seize the gas complex in the desert was hatched in northern Mali as well. Indeed, Mokhtar Belmokhtar, the veteran militant who has claimed overall responsibility for the siege, is believed to be based there.
But the Algerian official did not say why the captured kidnapper’s assertion — that some fighters had taken part in both the Benghazi and Algerian attacks — should be considered trustworthy. Nor did he say whether it was obtained under duress.
Instead, he focused on the chaos unleashed by the recent uprisings throughout the region, leaving large ungoverned areas where extremists can flourish.
“This is the result of the Arab Spring,” said the official said, who spoke on condition of anonymity because investigations into the hostage crisis were still under way. “I hope the Americans are conscious of this.”
American counterterrorism and intelligence officials have said that some members of Ansar al-Shariah, the group that carried out the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, had connections to Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, one of the militant groups now holding northern Mali. But American officials have also said that the Qaeda affiliate played no role in directing or instigating that Benghazi attack.
Similarly, Egyptian security officials said they believed that a longtime Islamist militant from Egypt was involved in the gas field attack, but the officials did not know of any connection to the Benghazi attack as well.
Algeria was firmly opposed to the Western intervention to help topple Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya in 2011, and this nation’s conservative leadership viewed the Arab Spring with deep suspicion, making no secret of its desire to avoid any such occurrences.
Small-scale demonstrations here were quickly stifled, and ever since Algerian officials have not hesitated to point at what they see as the connection between popular demands for greater democracy that have swept the Arab world and the rise of Islamist militancy in the region.
Algerian officials says the militants who seized the gas field traveled through Niger and Libya, whose border is only some 30 miles from the plant at In Amenas. Mohamed-Lamine Bouchneb, the militant leading the attack at the site, had purchased arms for the assault in the Libyan capital, Tripoli, the senior official said.
The kidnappers had also gathered, undisturbed, at the southern Libyan town of Ghat, just across the border from Algeria, he said, depicting Libya as anarchic, without an effective military force and an ideal staging ground for attacks like the one launched a week ago.
Having already experienced a large-scale Islamist insurgency in the 1990s, in which perhaps as many as 100,000 were killed, Algeria had no intention of experiencing another, the official suggested. He defended the tough Algerian military assault during the standoff and dismissed criticism by foreign leaders that they were not informed of it in advance.
“We left it all up to the military chiefs,” he said. “Myself, I was only informed a half-hour afterwards.”
His assertion squares with the widely held view of Algerian analysts that the military, and in particular a cadre of elderly generals, holds a wide degree of autonomy in the country and often acts independently of civilian leadership.
The official said that Algeria could expect more terrorist attacks, despite having delivered sharp blows to militants over a period covering nearly 15 years.
“We’re waiting for more,” he said. “We are not out of the woods yet.”
David D. Kirkpatrick contributed reporting from Cairo, and Eric Schmitt from Washington.

Crisis of the Pan African Intellectual

What is the revolutionary Pan African position on the Euro-American-Chinese occupation of Africa?
And what can the Diaspora do to stop the military campaigns for the mineral riches of Africa? Do we have drones, nukes, what? Can we tell African heads of state who are now in league with the Euro-Americans not to join the West in its supposed role of stopping the Islamic revolution? Perhaps we should make clear that the Arab Islamists, including the African Arab Islamists, are as much a problem as the Euro-Americans and Chinese, although the Chinese role appears to be purely economic, which is
nice if there is parity of trade between the Afro-Asians, but too often Chinese made goods destabilize the local economy with pricing and shoddy goods, often imitation cloth such as Kenti in Ghanna.

But what can we do, those intellectuals, Pan Africanists and revolutionary nationalists here in the belly of the beast. Dr. Nathan Hare and Kwame Toure argued over whether our focus should be to cut off the tentacles or the head of the serpent. Of course our focus must be the home front where our people are suffering greatly, jobless, ignorant, incarcerated, drugged out, diseased, etc.  Think globally but act locally. What can we do down here on the ground in Babylon? If you know, teach! If you don't know learn! The nature of events in Africa is complex with major issues of corruption, religion, tribalism, imperialism from a myriad sources, European, American, Arab, Asian, etc.

When will Africa be for the Africans? We see reactionary forces occupying Africa. America is placing American troops in 35 African countries. France is now in Mali to stop the Islamists, with American support of course. But does it matter to us whether the Euro-Americans or the Islamists occupy the land, both are known to be devils and destroyers of African culture.

And what shall we say about the African governments in cahoots with the imperialists or globalists?
The African politicians appear in lockstep with the colonizers and crusaders seeking control of Africa's precious minerals. From the neocolonialism of the last decades, we seek they are in the mood to make deals with the devil. After all, Kwame Nkruma taught us neocolonialism is colonialism playing possum.

The African nations collaborating with the occupiers are in the tradition of those who sold us to slavers.
In many of these nations, the former revolutionaries have turned reactionary, yes, in league with the devil. We can almost say no one in this African quagmire is without sin. Who are the good guys, the African leaders, the Euro-Americans, Arab Islamists, who?

Perhaps we can say the common people are the good guys, exploited and robbed of their labor and natural resources at every turn. How shall they gather the energy to seize people's power? The African bourgeoise is not about to give up power to the masses, thus the masses must fight internal forces and external forces of every stripe, European, American, Asian, Arab. This will employ sophistication and a broad understanding of all the forces involved, political, economic, religious.


Malian Front: France Wins First Round of the War, but Now What?

MALI-FRANCE-CONFLICT
ISSOUF SANOGO / AFP / GETTY IMAGES
Malian youth watch French soldiers drive down a road in Niono on Jan. 20, 2013
Three days after France sent jets screeching over the white skies of West Africa, a trail of over 50 Islamist-packed vehicles stormed south out of the desert, bypassing the Malian military post at the village of Dogofry and churning off the road into the shrubby bush. The group then split; some continued south, where they looped around to assault a Malian army base from the rear. The others took off on foot, around a swamp, to flank the Malians in battle. The Malian soldiers fought, then fled. Oumar Traore, like most villagers of Diabaly, scurried through the lush green fields to hide. For the next four days and nights, planes and helicopter blades whirred above, as automatic bursts fired back. And then: silence. Traore waited for several hours, then ventured out. The bearded men from the desert had left almost as suddenly as they had swooped in, leaving only charred souvenirs behind. “The bombing was too intense,” Traore said. “There were burnt trucks all around my neighborhood.”
France won Round 1 of its new war in Africa but not as smoothly as its military planners might have hoped. By the time it had successfully stopped the Islamist advance southward that prompted its intervention earlier this month, the hodgepodge of overlapping Islamist militias had dealt the French a quick lesson: they plan on fighting back.
The rebels finally retreated because they had no answer to the pummeling from the air. “The French would wait until the rebels had to move, then they’d hit them while running,” said Traore. The rebels tried everything to try to evade the air assault: hiding under trees, camouflaging trucks with mud and branches. They even broke into civilian homes, sometimes knocking down walls, to park their mounted guns in places the French would not bomb. Eventually, they pulled out.
But, the rebels also exposed a gaping chink in France’s armament: Paris still has no solution for the ground war. The first phase of France’s war in Mali took place in the country’s riverine center. Control a bridge here, a few checkpoints there, and you can secure a site. Not so in the desert, the rebels’ home turf, where France will have to press the fight next. The French need fighters, and the Malian army is not up to the task. Even after the rebels fled Diabaly, the Malian army refused to re-enter for over 24 hours and even then would not spend the night. There was no ground assault on the rebels’ position, even with the French airpower on their side. But so far, France hasn’t shown willingness to do the dirty work either. With the exception of French special forces deployed to assist the air assaults from the ground, the gathering swarm of French troops, now numbering over 2,000 in Mali, stayed south of the Malian lines.
French insistence on African troops leading the pack has resurrected the U.N.’s original intervention plan: a cobbled-together West African force that does not even exist yet. The U.N. has said such a force would take until September to be deployable, but now their troops are rolling piecemeal into Bamako, Mali’s capital, with new urgency but still without a defined command structure or size.
One option is for France to secure central and southern Mali and wait the weeks or, more likely, months until the African force is theoretically ready to go. The problem is that time is not on France’s side. The Islamists have ruled northern Mali since last spring, and every passing month grants the rebels’ more time to bolster their one glaring area of weakness: local support, or rather the lack of it. So far, the French intervention is wildly popular in Mali. Malians don’t appreciate the ultraconservative lectures on Islam: 90% of the country is Muslim, and Timbuktu, seized by Islamists earlier this year, was once the center of Islamic scholarship in the Muslim world, and they blame the rebels for their nation’s precipitous collapse.
But the Islamists are working hard to improve their reputation, especially with the youth. “They offered us money, candy. They told us we could join them. They were not abusive, they were trying to be nice,” said Fousseni Traore, a 19-year-old from Diabaly. Some in Diabaly joined the insurgents during the brief occupation. Northern Mali, ethnically and culturally, is even riper recruiting ground.
More time also means more room to regroup and prepare for the coming assault, and U.S. officials admit the Islamist coalition, including al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, already had too much of it. ”One of the hallmarks of AQIM is that they are generally quite well trained and quite effective, particularly if there’s no counterpressure on them, which there hadn’t been until the French launched their military action,” said State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland about the rebels’ counterstrike. To speed things up, France could try a hybrid approach by putting together a mix of Nigerian and Chadian troops, the most battle-hardened of the contributing countries, to forge ahead by its side as the rest of the African troops are readied and trained.
France deserves the world’s thanks for stepping in when and where no one else, the U.S. included, would. A collapsed Mali into the hands of Taliban-style hoodlums would have established a sinkhole of terrorism accessible from almost any corner of north, west and central Africa. American doubts that the crisis in Mali had direct national-security implications were profoundly shortsighted: as the Algerian hostage situation and the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi showed, Mali’s crisis already extends far past its borders. If no one had stopped the Islamists from taking all of Mali, the resulting calamity for the wider region would have been exponentially grimmer. The moral bravado of the French mission, however, will be of limited assistance on the battlefield as the conflict grinds on. As the French eye Mali’s north, there’s still a lot of sand to sift through.




Fillmore Jazz Heritage Center

Share This: 
John Santos at SFJAZZ Center Opening
CONGRATULATIONS TO SFJAZZ!

This is a historic day in San Francisco. Tonight is the debut performance for the new SFJAZZ Center, a major cultural institution that will attract visitors to our great City from around the world. Only two days ago, the jazz community and City turned out en masse for a ribbon-cutting ceremony amid glorious sunshine to launch the new building that blends into the cityscape through grand and iridescent walls of glass.
SFJAZZ AND JHC CONTINUE TO PARTNER
 
We are especially proud to continue our partnership with SFJAZZ for a second year, this year through a Koret Discover Jazz four-part series on Jazz and Blues Legends of the Bay Area, May 7-28. 
As SFJAZZ continues to provide a venue with great jazz from around the world, we continue to expand our mission of bringing you the story of how jazz originated in San Francisco, with a special emphasis on the history and culture of jazz born and nurtured in the Fillmore District where our Center is located.
John and Del Handy, Christine Harris and Kyle Goldman
John Handy in 1965
A FEBRUARY 24 SALUTE TO JOHN HANDY
 
There is no more fitting way to mark our upcoming Fifth Anniversary and the rich history of jazz in the Fillmore, than to celebrate the 80th birthday of one of our best native sons, the legendary John Handy.  Mark your calendars for this special tribute performance and the opening of a two-month exhibit in our Koret Heritage Lobby.  Jazz Historian and JAZZ 91.1/KCSM-FM Sonny Buxton will emcee this special evening with Glen Pearson on keys as bandleaders.  Visit our website for ticket information. 
ALSO AT THE JAZZ HERITAGE CENTER
 
Visit our Lush Life Gallery at 1320 Fillmore Street for a stunning exhibit by Ethiopian artists as part of our partnership with the Ethiopian Arts Forum.  The closing reception on February 17, 6-9 pm, will feature a performance by jazz pianist Elias Negash and his Quartet.  Regular Gallery hours are Wednesday - Sunday, 4-8pm.
THANK YOU
      ...for taking a moment to support the Jazz Heritage Center’s efforts to preserve the story of jazz in the Fillmore and the Bay Area.  If you or your company are interested in becoming a sponsor of the upcoming John Handy Tribute, please contact christine@jazzheritagecenterorg
We look forward to seeing you soo

Obama Urged to Free Blind Sheikh


Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, asked Obama to stand firm on the issue and warned that releasing Omar Abdel Rahman would be “seen as a major sign of weakness throughout the Muslim extremist world.”
State Department officials, though, tell FoxNews.com there is no discussion of Rahman being freed and categorize recent chatter as “empty talk.”
“There are no plans to release the Blind Sheik or transfer him to Egypt,” State Department Spokesman Noel Clay said. “Reports to the contrary are absolutely false.”
Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi fueled the speculation recently by saying he’d continue to work toward the release of Rahman, an Egyptian-born militant Islamist, even making his case directly to Obama. 
Rahman, who is blind, was convicted for his role in supporting the 1993 World Trade Center bombing; plotting to attack the United Nations, the Holland and Lincoln tunnels; and plotting to assassinate then-Sen. Alfonse D’Amato, R-N.Y., and current Assemblyman Dov Hikind. 
“I want him to be free, but I respect the law and the rule of law in Egypt and the United States,” Morsi said during an interview with CNN.
Morsi added that he would ask Obama during a March meeting at the White House to release Rahman on humanitarian grounds or at least ease prison restrictions.
“There could be things like visitation, assistance, his children, his family, assisting him,” Morsi said. “He is an old sheikh and sick and blind. We need to respect that in this sheikh.”
McCaul, a former federal prosecutor and counterterrorism expert, fired back and said releasing Rahman would “only serve to embolden our enemies who continue to plot against us.”
McCaul’s comments align with those made by his predecessor as committee chairman, Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. King told Fox News on Thursday that the president should not even "contemplate" Morsi's request, expressing concern that releasing Rahman may have been under consideration. He urged Obama to say "clearly, unequivocally" that Rahman will not be released. 
Rahman, considered one of the world’s leading theologians of terrorism, is currently serving a life sentence in a maximum-security federal prison in Butner, N.C.
Chris Burke, a spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, said he is unaware of the federal prison system ever releasing an inmate serving a life sentence at the request of a foreign leader.
Michael Mukasey, the federal judge who sentenced Rahman to life in prison, said transferring him “to an Egypt already under control of the Muslim Brotherhood and presided over by Mohammed Morsi would be pouring gasoline on a bonfire.”
Mukasey, who served as U.S. attorney general from 2007-2009 and as a district judge from 1988 to 2006, said even considering a transfer or release would be a “gross betrayal of public trust.”
Morsi’s calls to free Rahman began almost immediately after being elected president. In his acceptance speech in Cairo, Morsi said he’d work for Rahman’s release.
“It is my duty and I will make all efforts to have them free, including Omar Abdel Rahman,” Morsi said. 
The Obama administration has said publicly all along that it is not considering the appeals. 



Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/13/egypt-president-renews-call-to-free-blind-sheikh/#ixzz2Imlj8E2s


US State Department Actively Negotiating with Egyptian President Morsi's


The US State Department is actively negotiating with Egyptian President Morsi's government about transferring Omar Abdel-Rahman from US custody to Egyptian custody.

Rahman, also known as "the Blind Sheikh," is currently serving a life sentence in the US for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. But Egypt is pushing for his releasefor "humanitarian and health" reasons.
The Department of Justice says the possibility of release is ruled out by the fact that Rahman is serving a life sentence. But an unnamed official within the Obama administration has said the custody exchange is being considered regardless.
Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy believes the deal to release Rahman has already been reached by the administration, and they are just waiting until after the election to announce it. McCarthy believes this is why the DOJ so strongly ruled out Rahman's "release" but said nothing against his "transfer."
McCarthy was lead prosecutor in Rahman's case.