On the Rise of Donald Trump... And the Need for and Possibility of Real Revolution
March 7, 2016 | Revolution Newspaper | revcom.us
Donald Trump is three things.
One: Trump is the perfect representative of the ugliest, most
rotten, most parasitical, and most corrupt parts of the already
extremely ugly, vicious, and oppressive American empire and the social
values that embody that empire. Not only his political stances, but the
whole way he moves through life—the bullying, the sleaze, the worship
of and glorying in money, the pride in ignorance, the crude chauvinism
of “USA Number One,” the leering nastiness toward women:
this is exactly where the so-called American Dream leads. He embodies the exploitation and plunder that
is
capitalism, and the me-first mentality it spawns. He is an extreme
expression of that, but an expression nonetheless. This is what people
are conditioned to want and to follow in this society. And this is what
strikes a deep chord in the hard-core followers of this braying,
pig-headed jackass.
Two: Trump has pulled together a section of the fascist
movement in America in a much more visible and aggressive way. He is
organizing those whose feel left out and “disrespected,” who have been
taught that their white skin and American identity make them special
but who don’t “feel special” anymore, and who blame it on those they
have been taught to despise as being “beneath them” in society. This
sense of frustrated “white male entitlement” runs deep in the marrow of
white America; it is openly played on by the Republicans and “politely
respected” (while being played on its own way) by the Democrats—and now
Trump has taken it to a whole other level. He is aiming these angry
people at immigrants, at Black people—against, in short, the most
oppressed; he is aiming them against “foreigners” and “the different,”
and in particular against
all Muslims: and he is aiming them against
anyone
who would refuse to go along with the crimes of this system or who
even dares differ with Trump. He stirs “his people” up with a vision of
America rampaging, murdering, and openly torturing all around the
world—
open, crude, unapologetic gangsterism, as opposed to the
“refined” gangsterism of Obama. His rallies are not complete without
some of his minions mobbing and beating up anyone who would dare to
raise a voice against this, to the raucous cheers of the mob that Trump
has summoned. And should anyone criticize Trump online, he has millions
of followers who, piranha-like, create a “virtual mob” to go after
them.
In doing this, Trump has swept in many people who may not be
dyed-in-the-wool reactionaries, but whose dissatisfaction and
yearnings, coupled with their naiveté and even more than that the
historic advantage and status afforded them as “white people” in
America, make them susceptible to Trump’s appeal—which makes him all
the more dangerous.
All this and what it says about the larger society, even if
there were nothing else (and there is plenty else), concentrates the
need for a real revolution.
The Makings of a Crisis in Legitimacy
But there is more. Third, Trump has seriously exacerbated the
ongoing legitimacy crisis in the way that the American empire is ruled.
“Legitimacy” refers to the way in which people very broadly, in normal
times, perceive the rules by which the system runs—and the armed force
that is used to back up those rules—as being “legitimate.” They may
object and protest when these rules seem to be bent, or violated, by
those in power, but in normal times they mainly accept the rules
themselves. However, when these rules begin to be questioned and
violated by those who hold power, when those in power fall out in
disagreement over what the rules should be, when the rules do not seem
to work, when the working of the rules becomes so odious that people
are driven to resist, or when acts of resistance call the rules into
question... people may begin, on a mass scale, to question the very
rules themselves. Where did these rules come from in the first place,
and who and what do they serve? When people in their millions are
wondering about this, these questions become very dangerous indeed for
the ruling class.

For some time now, there has been fierce contention between
two groupings in the ruling class, more or less centered in the
Democratic and Republican Parties, precisely over forging new
“legitimating norms,” or rules. This contention has gone on for two
decades now and takes many different forms—right now, the very sharp
and unprecedented fight over whether Obama will be allowed to exercise
his constitutional duty to nominate another Supreme Court justice is one
example. But at bottom is a fight over what will be the “legitimating
norms”—the cohering consensus of the “rules” of society—in a time of
great change and upheaval.
The system as a whole faces multiple crises on different
fronts—the globalization and “turbo-charging” of the world economy,
which has led to the hollowing out of the domestic industrial base and
the downgrading of the living standards of tens of millions of people,
accompanied by an extraordinarily pronounced income inequality... the
fracturing international situation, with a direct challenge to the U.S.
(and Western Europe) mounted by the fundamentalist Islamic jihadist
forces but also coming from other rivals... the tumultuous changes in
the role of women, economically and culturally, especially in relation
to the family... and changes in the “racial” makeup of America—the
increasing necessity to rely on immigrant labor coupled with the actual
removal of millions of African-Americans
out of the labor
force, and the institution of a genocidal system of mass
incarceration... and the intensifying ecological crisis. There is
widespread alienation and a feeling, among many different sections of
people, that the system is not working and the rules are not being
applied fairly.
The Center—Can It Hold?
Here the observations and analysis in the article “The Center—Can It Hold? The Pyramid as Two Ladders,” from the pamphlet
The Coming Civil War and Repolarization for Revolution in the Present Era,
by Bob Avakian (BA), are very relevant. BA writes that “when a
legitimacy crisis occurs, when the ‘glue’ that holds society together
begins to come undone, and there is an attempt to forge a new ruling
consensus, then it is acutely posed whether that attempt to forge a new
ruling consensus (a new ‘social glue,’ so to speak) is going to hold
and work.”
Faced with this, the Democrats have in the main gone for a
more “multicultural” approach. They pay lip service to and attempt to
recast and channel the struggles of the different oppressed
nationalities that have been historically severely discriminated
against to allow room for some small sections to advance, while locking
the majority into even more desperate conditions (for example, the
“welfare reform” cuts and mass imprisonment carried out under the first
Clinton regime). They generally prefer to wrap their military
aggression in “soft power” and alliances overseas while continuing to
carry out vicious war crimes by drone and wage really savage wars
through proxies like Saudi Arabia. They make some reforms in the
“social safety net” in a “business friendly” way, even while presiding
over draconian cuts overall.
Those mainly grouped around the Republicans have opted for the
openly aggressive use of military power AND the building up of a
fascist base within the U.S. around the imposition of fundamentalist
Christian beliefs and values, a cult of the military, and a much more
unrestrained capitalism, which has included the further gutting of the
unions. In this dynamic, the Republicans have for decades been far
more aggressive, and the Democrats have over and over sought to
conciliate with them—while the Republicans have denied the very
legitimacy of the last two Democratic presidents.

Right now, each of these groups has encountered problems in
the current electoral campaign. This finds expression within the
Democrats in the candidacy of Bernie Sanders, running on a platform of a
“people’s revolution,” and as a “democratic socialist” who professes
his aim to bring people into the electoral process in the form of the
Democratic Party. Never mind that his candidacy is NOT a people’s
revolution, nor is he a socialist, and that getting people to put on the
straitjacket of the Democratic Party (even a supposedly slightly
roomier straitjacket) will make it impossible to actually confront and
solve the problems facing humanity.
But these problems are much sharper in the Republican Party.
The main forces in this party find themselves going up against the
person leading in the nomination fight in a way that has not happened
in living memory. To be clear: Trump has, from the beginning, been
backed by larger forces; he is not quite the “independent actor” he
poses as. The wall-to-wall coverage he has gotten since last
summer—which until recently was quite respectful—is not simply
explained by “ratings.” But right now the main forces in the Republican
Party have indeed grouped up against Trump in a rather unprecedented
way.
For years, the Republicans have used the very same themes with
the very same people that Trump is now ringing with such success. In
fact, Trump’s main rival, Ted Cruz, is himself an extreme fascist, many
of whose positions are even more reactionary than Trump’s. Cruz also
is fighting with Trump for the Christian fascists—Trump has a
significant hunk of these, but has also expanded this base to other
sections and has been welding all this together under his command, which
is part of the particular threat he poses overall, and part of the
threat to Republicans—but also part of why people like the Republican
governor and former candidate Chris Christie are drawn to Trump.
But the fact that all these Republicans, and the party as a
whole, have based themselves on these themes is why, once they
perceived him as a possible threat, they had no real way to counter him
(at least at first). When they attack him for being a racist apologist
for the Klan... when they attack him for being a hater of women (a
misogynist)... well, it rings hollow, because this is what
their
whole party has relied upon, this has been at the very core of their
appeal. The more this goes on, and the more the underlying dynamics are
dragged into the light, the more people may wonder why this racist,
chauvinist, fascist party has been viewed as legitimate at all. They
may wonder why the Democrats have not only sought to cooperate with the
Republicans, but have bent over backward to conciliate with them. Who
and what does this serve? Which class and what class interests?
Conversely, if Trump is put down by the Republican
establishment, how would his base respond to that? Already, the militia
movement and similar groups are all over the Trump thing—they don’t
even conceive of the current government as legitimate. What then if
those in charge violate their own rules to deny Trump the nomination?
They may, to be sure, be able to do this in a way that discredits Trump
among the people he has up to now called forward, and do so without
real damage to themselves. But they may not, either.
As BA also said in this same series (“The Danger of the
Christian Fascists and the Challenges This Poses”), “you can’t keep
making promises to these forces, as the Republican Party does—you can’t
keep making promises and then leave them unfulfilled.” Trump has
exposed and taken advantage of the fact that the section of the ruling
class grouped around the Republicans has
not, over decades,
really “delivered” to this base. The vaunted American military has been
defeated or bogged down all over the world by foes who are much weaker
militarily. Black people have not only NOT been “put in their place,”
they have in the past few years led a huge questioning of American
racism and the streets have been filled, at different times, with all
kinds of people uniting and putting it on the line against racist
police murder.
And even though Obama in fact is nothing but an instrument—in
fact, the commander-in-chief—of this very same empire, for the people
in this hard core Republican base
the very idea of a Black man in authority—let alone president—is totally intolerable and illegitimate.
And there’s more: gay people, rather than being ostracized and cast
out, have been much more accepted, with the Supreme Court even granting
the right of marriage equality. And while, yes, they have continued to
hammer at women, and have taken away the right to abortion from
millions, this doesn’t satisfy these followers of patriarchy; further,
if the Supreme Court rules against the savage, woman-hating new
abortion restrictions in Texas and other states that are now coming up
for review, these people will be highly inflamed. Finally, there have
been the ongoing serious cuts in the living standards of tens of
millions that we referred to above, which form a backdrop and
underpinning of all this.
The Rise of a Would-Be American Hitler
Trump now
comes and claims to redeem these frustrated promises. He aims to cohere a
section of the longtime Christian fascists, with newer people who
share many of the same feelings of resentment and rage, ultimately
based on white American entitlement.
The implications loom very large, even as things are still in a
great deal of flux. If Trump wins the nomination, then this movement
would likely be further unleashed, with extremely ugly consequences in
every part of society. If Trump becomes president, this would reach a
whole other dimension, with Trump himself then moving to implement the
program he has run on.
And what if those in the ruling class who perceive Trump as a
threat, and are now—after letting him build himself up for months,
after promoting him during those same months—attacking him... what if
they succeed in derailing his quest for the Republican nomination?
Well, they would have a problem: What do they do with this movement
that has now cohered around him? It is not clear in that case what
either Trump, or the people he has drawn around him, would do.
Further, this situation could increasingly pose problems for
the Democrats as well. For instance, what if a section of the people
stoked up by Trump is either disappointed by him being denied the
nomination or, alternatively, is emboldened by his winning it, and
escalates their violence against the people whom the Democrats consider
“their base”? The Democrats continually conciliate with the
fascists—what if they do so again, and refuse to lead people to
confront this... when there are people in a mood to do so?
These are the type of things that those who make the decisions
in the American empire might have to confront: What would cause more
instability and harm for their interests, as they perceive them?
What to Do and How to Proceed in the Face of this Fascist Threat
Whatever immediately happens, the times are becoming heavier.
There will be repression. The current polarization—in which tens of
millions of people are looking for a way out, but see their
alternatives as being between fascists like either Trump or Cruz, and
the Democrats (including the supposedly “radical alternative” of
Sanders)—is NOT good, and left to itself would lead to disaster. There
must be RE-polarization
for revolution—and this must be
wrenched out of the current situation. There will NOT be any easy road to something better.
There is, and there must be more, resistance to this—not in
the form of voting for a Democrat—but building on the kind of thing you
see already in people going into these Trump rallies and calling him
out.
But the most important thing we have to understand is
this: The turmoil at the top of society right now... the emergence of
political figures who aim to change how the people are ruled,
in possibly dramatic and extremely disruptive ways... the fighting
amongst the rulers over what to do about this... opens new
possibilities, and new necessity, to expose the system that has spawned
this and to build a magnetic pole around an organized force that
represents a real alternative: real revolutionary hope on a solid
scientific foundation. All this taken together is part of a process
that could create an opening in which a force that is going for
revolution, and willing and able to lead people to do that, can make
tremendous gains and possibly even open up the chance to go for it all. That is, to lead millions to go for revolution, all-out, with a real chance to win.
This is not the only possible outcome, nor is it necessarily
something that would grow one-two-three out of the present situation.
But revolution will NOT be made in a ready-made, easy-bake situation;
it will necessarily involve turmoil, upheaval, and advancing in the
face of sharp repression. The point is to analyze, grasp, and work on
those possibilities now.
The complexities of that... all the challenges that would
pose... all that is beyond what we are going to get into in this
article or this issue. But we DO have an
article guiding you into the works of Bob Avakian,
who has developed a whole way of scientifically understanding this
kind of social upheaval and how extremely dangerous situations can be
seized on, with the right kind of leadership, to make huge gains. How
to apply those principles will be very much on our site and in our
pages over the next months, as this unfolds. And you, our readers, have
a definite role to play in getting into these works, and writing in
with your thinking provoked by them.
Right now, though, some things that CAN and MUST be said about
what the rise of Trump, even now, means for those working for
revolution:
It means, most of all, getting out to people that there is a
REAL and NECESSARY alternative to all of this: revolution. This means,
right now and in the coming months, seizing on the highly charged
atmosphere to get BA out to millions—his way of understanding the
world, the vision of a new society he’s developed (concretized in the
Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America),
and the strategy to accomplish this. And this includes, as part of
this, going out to those attracted to Sanders’ message and winning them
to see that what we face cannot be dealt with in the terms Sanders is
proposing—this is, as we said recently, an illusion... a “wisp of
painless progress.”
It means preparing ourselves, the movement for revolution, and
the people to deal with the much more repressive atmosphere already
being unleashed, and the heightened repressive measures and actions
that now loom with the ascendancy of Trump (and which, whatever happens
to Trump, his candidacy is creating public opinion and organization
for). This means very much building a wall of support around BA—based
on people understanding what he is all about and coming to respect and
love him on that basis.
This is extremely important. Without a REAL alternative,
people will remain locked on the same deadly treadmill they now find
themselves on.
It means getting out among the people and showing very vividly
how Trump actually embodies what America stands for and does not in
any fundamental way go against it, and that the solution is
not
to return to the illusion of “America’s democratic traditions,” nor to
throw our energies into electing a Democrat as some kind of defense,
but to actually fight to get rid of a system that produces no end of
Trumps, Reagans, and, yes, Clintons, once and for all. It means getting
out both to those opposing Trump
and to those who are
currently seduced by him but whose most fundamental interests and
aspirations can only be met by communist revolution and who, through
struggle, can be won to see that. The basis to do this and to succeed
in doing it lies in the contradictions of this social system and what
it gives rise to, in so many different ways—and that Trump is not an
anomaly, or some weird exception, but a concentration of this social
system at a time of crisis.
It means getting revcom.us and
Revolution newspaper
way out there into society. In a time like this, when people are
unusually hungry to understand what is going on and what to do about
it, this website and paper must truly be, as BA has called for, “the
guide, the pivot, the crucial tool in drawing forward, orienting,
training, and organizing thousands, and influencing millions—fighting
the power, and transforming the people, for revolution—hastening and
preparing for the time when we can go for the whole thing, with a real
chance to win.” And it means this on a whole other level.
Revolution Club at Rise Up October
Get with the
Revolution Club here
In addition, the movement for revolution must assume much more
powerful form. This means that the Revolution Clubs have to become
much more vital forces in the neighborhoods and campuses, recruiting
people on the basis of their two slogans: Humanity Needs Revolution and
Communism; and Fight the Power, and Transform the People, for
Revolution. This means that centers of revolution—the bookstores—must
become vital sites where BA’s new synthesis of communism engages and
contends with key trends in society and coheres the trend of
revolutionary communism. And finally, the Party itself, the vanguard,
needs to grow and further develop—quantitatively and, yes,
qualitatively, in its scientific rigor and revolutionary orientation.
It means continuing to mobilize people to fight the power, both to tap into the
righteous anger and defiance that people do feel toward Trump, reaching out to and joining with those who disrupt his rallies
and,
at the same time and even more important, continuing to fight—and to
draw more people into the fight—against police terror and other forms
of the oppression of Black and Brown people... against the oppression
of women and, right now, the vicious attempts to deny tens of millions
of women the right to abortion... against the demonization of
immigrants... the wars... and the plunder of the environment.
In short, these are times of danger... and times of great opportunity. Prepare to rise to the challenge before us.